2012 so far…

If I were a religious man, this would be what my year is starting to look like….

Posted in Home Page/Journal, Journal | Leave a comment

Dead Bears (and other human stupidities)

So, I’ve been very busy and haven’t gotten into the frame of mind to commit to this blog as much as I should.  And I was going to leave this for a bit longer, at least until the ground froze, and get some more “work” done.  I’ve refrained from commenting on all sorts of things, though it’s been difficult, but this is way too much.

I’m sorry but I don’t believe the “oh, these savage killer animals–lions, tigers, bears, giraffes and such — are going to kill us all in our beds so we have to kill them all” crap.  If you’re stupid, maybe, if you don’t warn everyone and plan well, maybe….

oh, wait, we’re talking about humans, aren’t we?  Well, maybe, considering we’re quite stupid and paranoid when it comes to anything we don’t understand and can’t completely manipulate then we’re all ready to shoot it dead, including other people.

But back to the animals.  And no, I don’t believe Hanna’s crap about “can’t tranquilize animals at night”.  I bet they didn’t even try.  He’s giving the cops and crew an excuse to shoot things, and I bet he knows it.  Or perhaps he hasn’t listened to the North American Bear Center‘s Lynn Rogers contention that the old mantra “A fed bear is a dead bear” is wrong.  So, if these animals were fed on Monday, chances are they weren’t particularly hungry and probably not that dangerous (at least the bears) unless they were scared.  If a bunch of gun toting Ohio policemen came calling and swaggering up to me I’d be scared, too.  I’ve seen cops in action when it comes to “conservation” and yes, they’d rather shoot first.  Then you can go back to the little lady that night and say “Guess what your man did today?  He shot a bear/tiger/lion today.  Yes,sir, he’s a real man, now, just like Hemingway/British Royalty/Great White Hunter.  Was I scared?  Hell, no.  I got this big gun, see?  Just like Ted Nugent.  Nothin’s gonna fuck with me.  I may never get to Africa/India but I’m still a real man! Now give me some honey.”

Yeah, these guys exist.  I live in a whole friggin’ region of them.  And I’ve read the commentaries by various Americans defending the Sheriff’s actions.  No, I agree they are not trained for this sort of thing, but I tend to think that cops in general are not really trained for a lot of these things these days, and that shoot first ask questions later has become a mantra.  Maybe the States is more “dangerous” now, but that means you have to be a better people and relying on killing what you don’t understand, on what you fear, is a short term solution.  I could say that happens to be a whole American ideology, but considering the American exceptionalism rhetoric going around these days that would just be heaping fresh dirt on an old grave.  But if you’re going to be an exception you’d better have an exceptional character, which means courage and moral and ethical fortitude in the face of a difficult situation.  Shooting first is instinctual and emotional, not strategic, not thoughtful.  I’ve lost human neighbors to hunters shooting first and not thinking, nearly lost my mother once to guys in the dark in the back of a pick-up, until they realized she was on a horse.  And, yes, I have more examples, but those are for another time.

And for those who say I don’t know, I’ve been to the African savanna and come face to face with a big male lion who stared across a very thin pane of glass at me like I was an interesting type of fly that might have to be swatted, and that was all.  No, bears have nothing on lions, or tigers for that matter–well, polar bears are something else: always remember, punch them in the nose… really, it works, I’m not lying.

Now, maybe you think I’m some sort of free-lovin’, left wing, save the whales “looney”, well, I’ve lived in the bush for DECADES and a lot of animals have died on this ranch for a lot of different reasons, quite a few of them bears.  But those bears we shot because they caused more trouble then we could handle, a few of which have tapped on our windows, chased our horses and cows, killed a few calves, went through my parents’ trailer when they first moved up here way back when, are a dismal few compared to the number who we’ve lived with on a very peaceful basis.  They eat our grain when we plant it, roll around in it and cause some serious loss sometimes if there’s enough of them, but really we hardly ever see them.  We know they’re there, they know we’re here.  We keep out of each others way.  So, in general, I am completely in agreement with Lynn Rogers’ contention that properly fed bears are quite alright and really want nothing to do with you.  This year we have a very cute little one year old black that’s been raiding our wheat fields and a grizzly sow with two cubs that has been hanging around and scared the living crap out of the cow herd that boarded here for the summer, and maybe she or another bear killed a cow and calf (but that’s another story).  And there are a few more around (mostly because of the grain) but, though I found a small bear stool in my grain test plots just outside our house, they leave us alone.  This is a negotiated peace, though many people might not understand that idea.  As bears are territorial we’ve probably had the same ones around here for many years.  They haven’t caused any trouble we couldn’t handle.  Even when we’ve lost a calf to a bear that is an acceptable loss.  We are the invaders here, not them, and, as such, if we want to live in the bush and enjoy a solitude based in nature then we must run the risk of actually encountering nature, real nature. 

Around the world humans are wiping out, or trying to wipe out, anything they consider threatening in any manner.  So when all the wolves are eliminated from Yellowstone and surroundings the ranchers are happy, when the elephants in Africa trampling crops are again being slaughtered by ivory poachers the farmers get happy.  In short, we only want nature our way, forcing it to buckle to our demands without negotiation or recognition of our role as the agent prococateurs.  There has always been “human/nature conflict”, it’s one of the great recurring themes in all the world’s literatures and mythologies but it has often been completely overblown, as with the human fear of wolves in North America.  How many movies have emphasized wolf attacks only because it reaches deep into our fear (which is why I have little hope for the Liam Neeson movie “The Grey”) when you are more likely to be attacked by the coyote that lives in your park next door who really just wants to eat your cat, or the German Shepherd-pitbull cross that the macho though incredibly insecure idiot across the street has just so he can scare the neighbours (there should be a permit and a psychological check-up for anyone who wants to own a pitbull, rottweiler, or German Shepherd because they are wonderful and very sensitive dogs and require proper love and care that you don’t find in many dog owners, especially those who think they’re “tough” or “mean” and want a dog who they think represents that image).

Back to the point: the release was in a rural area, the animals don’t seem to have gone to far, there were 18,18, Bengal tigers, soon to be extinct in the wild.  Yes, it was turning into night, and yes, the animal seemed to have had a rather strange relationship with their “owner” Terry Thompson, him being a gun lover and animal abuser and all, so they might have been somewhat aggressive, but what the heck do you expect?  You take the high ground (like, say a truck crane) with a sniper’s rifle with night vision and some darts.  Is that so hard?  It’s the States, for cripes’ sake, you could probably ask your grandmother for one of her guns.  It’s not like the animals are shooting back.  They’ll either run away (not very far, by the sounds of it) or claw up the truck a bit before they go down.  Big deal.  You don’t go meandering through a herd of carnivores and think that it’s a smart thing to do.  Heck, you don’t do it in a buffalo or elephant or water buffalo or even the wrong cow herd, why would you think a bear wouldn’t charge you? For a state of rural “hunters” these guys panic way too easy.  They don’t know animals.

And don’t me started about how this guy ever even got to keep these animals.  If you can’t take care of it properly, you shouldn’t have it.  He had 62 years to learn.  Animals, like people, need care, love and respect.  There’s enough suffering in the world without adding to it this way.  Maybe he couldn’t help it psychologically, and maybe he finally came to recognize that and his final gesture was that of freedom for his animals, both from their cages and from him, but it was too late.  And that really is a tragedy all round.

And private zoos are the way of the future? I love zoos and aquariums, but it is a guilty pleasure, and there is no doubt things must change to better care for the animals psychologically and physically, and no doubt they won’t, especially when money and profit, based on entertainment and self-satisfaction, is involved rather than science, education, and compassion.

Yeah, well, that’s the world for you….

For those of you who think bears are something that all ranchers (and their herds) fear, or should fear, below is a good example of how things balance out.  As I’ve mentioned before, we’ve lost calves to bears, but that was almost always because a cow left her calf while she went to forage or they were in scrub bush, which is perfect ambush territory for a bear.  That’s why cows out in the back forty are often tougher than nails because they’ve always got to be on the alert.  Anyway, these shots come via a relative’s email from someone who I don’t know down in the Kettle Valley.  Many thanks to you, who ever you are, for these fantastic shots.  But it’s a very good example of what can happen out on the range or in the front yard.  Here we see what looks like a rather inexperienced two year black bear (it’s pretty small) attacking in the open, which is something that I hope it survived and learned from.  And yes, I know what that bear’s gone through.  There’s nothing like being upside-down under a mad cow.  Anyway, on with the show…

Never underestimate a Canadian Cow!!!

Cows taking on a black bear in B.C., Canada.
Now this is some tough beef…

Interesting photos from a ranch in the Kettle Valley , BC area where every year they have to deal with some pretty weird stuff.
This year a bear had been bothering the herd and I guess enough was enough.

Read on…

A couple of evenings ago, Wayne went out to check the cows and saw a very strange sight and was able to photograph the event.
A black bear approached our cow herd which turned out to be a very big mistake on his part.

The blonde and white Simmental cow we know as I-12 went right for him.
She is a very good cow, a very attentive mother and about 12 years old.
She’s in her prime and knows that bears are bad news.

She tried her best to mash him into the ground.
There are a couple of photos where the bear is biting I-12′s leg and clawing her face but she is not giving up.
Her stiff tail shows how agitated she is.
Wayne said all the cows were bawling, the bear was squealing, the calves were running around with their tails in the air.

A younger cow, R-55, an Angus-Cross cow, age 7, is helping her out as best she can.
It is an incredible photo to see two cows at once trying to crush the bear.

I looked up the calving records of both cows who are so aggressive in these photos and they are both good, calm cows around us
And have given us no troubles whatsoever.
I’ll have to add in my notes that they have a very distinct dislike of bears.

We’ll be watching I-12 over the next few days to see if she needs treatment for infection.
I don’t know how willingly she’ll come to the corrals for treatment, but she might not have a choice.

Finally, the bear decided to vacate the area.
We thought he’d be dead for sure, but there was no sign of him the next day.
We’ll have to keep an eye out for eagles in the trees or flocks of ravens flying up.
We’re sure he’s got some broken ribs out of the deal at the very least.
Wayne couldn’t believe his eyes when he witnessed this ruckus.


This is another once-in-a-lifetime photography event to add to all the others he managed to document thissummer.
It is amazing. Whoever said Cows were stupid are so Wrong….they have a heart and a mind too!

Posted in Home Page/Journal | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Because God told me I have to…

When it comes to religion I’m not very humourous, mostly because I find religion very humourless (well, the buddists have some funny lines) but sometimes I’m wrong (actually, some people will argue I’m wrong all the time, but that’s another story).  By this I mean I will watch a film like this:

and I will be angry for a while because it rather reinforces my prejudicial inklings as to Christians and religion in general.  I grew up an Anglican but, let’s face it, logic and reason was never a strong suit of any sort of religious debate unless it is based upon the premise that God exists, or the specific faith is completely valid and truthful, and then you have religious scholars arguing and then sometimes, as we have seen with the Protestants and Catholics and the Shiites and Sunnis, all out war.  Over what is pretty much the same thing with different coloured bells.  I’m not saying all regions are the same, even in their core beliefs (even the idea of “love” is a malleable concept: who loves who?  who should love who?  why should they be loved? etc.), what I’m saying is there is nothing as vicious as a civil war, so when I see someone with an excellent sense of humour in a religious debate I find it both refreshing and hopeful and think maybe there is some hope for humanity after all…

But then, of course, who knows what they really believe when the chips come down.

Posted in Journal | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Harper’s Checkmate strategy

“The preoccupation with what should be is estimable only when the respect for what is has been exhausted.”

Ortega y Gasset

 

Ok, Canada, stop with the outrage, the impulse thinking, the reactive squawking about the Conservative senate appointments.  If you have been watching Harper for the last decade or so you would know he doesn’t play his hand up front.  He’s learned to become political a magician precisely because he’s mastered the media.  This little bait-and-switch game is a perfect example.  The bait is the three conservative senators re-vamped even though they lost their elections, thus outraging the public into changing the senate.  Harper has planned this very well:

1.  Try to make it look like you’re slipping it past the media and the public, even though you know they’ll catch it and it will bring down the fire. Make sure that the appointments really infest the public with bile by appointing people who have lost elections thus making a mockery of the senate even more, thus making a call for reform so obvious that even the most jaded Canadian (like me) will stand up on his or her two legs and cry foul.  Make the mob angry and then point the finger and they will rush the gates.  You won’t have to do a thing, really.

2. Harper is used to the cynicism and people disliking him.  He’s won the popular vote and will hold onto it for four years by which time this whole sorry mess will be forgotten and the senate reformed.  He knows most people’s attention spans, if they even pay attention, which most, it seems, don’t, are very, very short.  He’s played this card over and over again and the human condition has proven him right over and over again.  As long as he makes no big mistakes, or at least buries them quickly before they can stink, there will nothing  to effect his chances come the next election.  In fact, this senate reform will paint him as a leader who gets things done.

3.  He’s aware that the NDP wants to abolish the senate.  He must get the senate changed quickly before the NDP actually gets itself properly organized and experienced or the Liberals find their feet again (if they ever do).  He’s knows the NDP will jump at the chance to at least reform the senate, believing they will get to show the public they are being effective.  Harper’s lost both Quebec and Newfoundland and he knows they aren’t going Conservative anytime soon.  Hence that’s where he’ll make the plays because there’s nothing to lose in either of those provinces, at least right now.  Long term, things might change, but right now the NDP can have a little something to crow about when the senate changes.  Later on, the victory will seem like Harper’s.

4. The Conservatives may come off looking somewhat compromising, an image which they have so far not cultivated because they did not want to slip into any left wing territory.  Many people, including a lot of pundits, tend to think that the Conservatives have been playing the centrist card in order to get rid of the Liberals.  They have and they haven’t.  The fact is that our society, pushed along by a subtle but determined right wing agenda, has been moving the goal posts another couple of feet right every year, never losing any ground.  There are all kinds of indicators of this, such as:  the faltering influence of unions; the fact that a once somewhat ignored right wing think tank like the Fraser Institute is now considered centrist and is consulted by all sorts of organizations including the “leftist” CBC; the Republicans in the US can block any change the Democrats want to make to regulations governing large financial corporations and not suffer any significant ramifications from their constituencies, thus indicating that the corporate agenda has completely hijacked America’s individualist ideals.  Harper, being a Calgary economist and thus a Chicago school economist, believes very strongly in American right wing policies and strong ties to the US.  Any chance to move in this direction while using the opposition’s own convictions against them is far too good to pass up.

5.  No one would ever believe Harper could be this Machiavellian.  There are three reasons for this:  1)  most people tend to think other people think like themselves, thus thinking three days to a year ahead can sometimes be a stretch, and most ignore political history and are unaware that Harper does not.  The consequence is that you are thinking through the next move on the chess board while Harper is at least ten moves ahead of you.  Just because you would not take the risk of attacking the opposition’s queen with a pawn (or three) which you know you will lose doesn’t mean he won’t.  He’s playing a much longer strategy. 2) Conservatives will self-delude themselves that he isn’t doing this because, even though they may know it in their hearts, they will not admit into their consciousnesses that he’s playing them, that he’s playing them all.  The key is shallow temporary thinking: short term pain for long term gain.  Conservatives will have to defend the senate appointments whether they agree with them or not, getting caught up in the debate of how stupid this move is and how they’ll justify it.  Denials are flying that Harper has done this on purpose to provoke senate change because the NDP may take advantage and eliminate the senate altogether which, of course, is a load of crap.  But you have to tell yourself and your audience something to make the show convincing, avoiding cognitive dissonance is a necessary pastime with all politicians.  Later, Conservatives will worship him as a master strategist (some even do now).  Presently, everyone else is just disgusted and missing the whole point, as Jack Layton demonstrates.  3)  Canadians are not used to Harper’s kind of politics because we don’t really think anything intangible can effect us or hurt us, except not having enough money.  We have a very rosy pink idea of who we are, even though most of us tend to define ourselves by who we are not (Americans).  And though we may work through life via grandiose doses of hypocrisy, fragrant ignorance, naive intelligence, and occasional malevolence, we rarely think of ourselves as Shakespearean- level plotters and so, when confronted with one, we really have no idea of what we’re looking at.  Such thinking sort of goes against the belief of the easy-going, hard-working ethic of our natures.

6.  Harper has a long history of this sort of thing.  This last election was not Iggy’s idea, not really, it was Harper’s.  The Conservatives had spent years ruining Iggy’s image and he had not shown the slightest ability to strike back with any confidence and thus anything he said during any election would be painted with his intellectual ineffectiveness, as indeed it was.  Thus the historical contempt of Parliament the Conservatives prompted was a calculated risk.  You don’t do that unless you know that 1) it will mean nothing to a public who already finds politics generally contemptible and doesn’t pay attention and 2) the opposition will have no choice but to call you on it, if not for ethical reasons then at least for procedural reasons and not losing any more face, which they could no longer afford to loose, and 3) you’ve already prepared for an election way in advance.  People tend to think reactively, so vaguely doing something to someone under the radar so it doesn’t look like bait allows Harper’s strategies to work, allowing him and the Conservatives to play the victims.  Thus Harper was able to complain about the opposition “demanding an election no one wanted” when, in fact, he was quite happy to have an election he wanted.  This latest senate strategy works very much along the same lines.

I could go on but I always get complaints I write too much.  So I’ll stop there and leave you with this last little tidbit, because Harper really gets to me, but not in a good way:

 

 

Posted in Home Page/Journal | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sharks

So today, at the 2nd Annual Marine Conservation Congress, the discussion was focusing on sharks I’m told.  I won’t get started on things like bycatch or sharkfin soup except to say imagine aliens trawling the streets of Vancouver for people of Chinese ethnicity while catching everybody of any descent, killing them, keeping the Chinese and throwing the other bodies back on the street.  As for finning, well, I suggest that at least some people wouldn’t want to live very long even if they survived the trauma of having their arms and legs hacked off and were dumped back on their lawns.  73 million sharks a year, baby, maybe in another 20 years we’ll have wiped all those smug people eaters off the earth because they kill what, 12 people a year on average around the world?  Seems a fair trade.

Years ago, I thought science was probably the most wonderful thing in the world so I went to college to study biology, my first love.  This was a big mistake for three reasons: 1) I had the wrong roommate, a longtime friend who was in a program where he could party a lot and fool around. The program I was taking was very intensive and I was consistently broke, which meant I was always looking for a way out of my misery because 2) I was way too young and confused and a perfect example of why one should probably work in the real world so as to figure out what the hell one wants to do because 3) you’re going to be disappointed if you think what you do will mean anything if you go to work for the government or business.  For example, this little review of how Canada’s government worked to stop the collapse of the Atlantic cod fishery, or rather didn’t, and what they did to the scientists who tried to warn people:

“Once the government got wise to the threat posed by Myers, it did its best to silence him. In one instance, it forbade him and two colleagues to distribute written copies of a paper, minimizing the effects on young cod of increased seal populations, to an international conference on marine mammals. One of the co-authors recalled, “because of the politically sensitive nature of the work and because our conclusions were at odds with recent statements by the minister and government spokespersons regarding the influence of seals in the collapse and recovery of northern cod, we were not permitted to distribute copies of our work to our fellow scientists” (SCOFO 1997a, 945-50). When a member of Parliament requested a copy of the report, then Fisheries Minister Brian Tobin denied that it existed (Thorne 1997). Later questioned about his denial, he replied that scientists could be petulant, pompous prima donnas and suggested firing them: “Take all of these scientists if they feel constrained working within government and make them free” (CP 1997b). In another case, the threat of departmental intimidation persuaded a colleague to withdraw an article, co-authored with Myers, maintaining that harp seals had not caused the cod collapse (Harris 1998, 297). Senior bureaucrats also harassed Myers’s adviser and the director of his laboratory in their efforts to suppress his politically undesirable research (SCOFO 1997b, 945-50). Myers pointed out that the department “seemed to have a notion that you could sit in Ottawa and make up reality. If you could enforce a scientific consensus, that would become reality” (Cameron 1998).

When, in 1995, Myers told Canada’s national newspaper that “what happened to the fish stocks had nothing to do with the environment, nothing to do with seals. It is simply overfishing,” DFO formally reprimanded him:

Your comments, as presented by the media, did not give a balanced perspective on the issue of the status of the cod stocks and were inconsistent with the June 1995 Newfoundland Stock Status Report. .  . . Your . . . disregard for both departmental policy on communication with the media and the professional opinions of your colleagues warrant the disciplinary action of a written reprimand. In the future, you are expected to respect both the system of primary spokespersons and peer conclusions on matters within your area of expertise. (Hutchings et al.  1997, 1203)

Myers was lucky to get off so easy: He later recalled that the assistant deputy minister of science had wanted to fire him, but that his science director had bargained him down to a reprimand (SCOFO 1997b, 1050-5).

Even Myers’s departure from DFO did not spare him the department’s wrath. In 1997, after he told the Ottawa Citizen about the bureaucracy’s efforts to suppress his research into the role of seals in the cod stock collapse, two senior bureaucrats sued both the paper and the scientist for libel (Strauss 1997b). David Schindler, a scientist who worked with DFO for twenty-two years, called the lawsuit “the worst form of intimidation.” But the suppression and intimidation hardly surprised him: “It’s almost a tradition in the Canadian civil service to act this way” (Harris 1998, 299). Tradition or not, Myers refused to be cowed.  He told a government committee, “I believe it is simply a suit to get me to shut up. . . . This is not a private suit. This is a suit by bureaucrats who are doing it on government time and who are using government resources to harass citizens whose opinions they don’t like” (SCOFO 1997b, 950-5).”

From Elizabeth Brubaker’s chapter “Unnatural Disaster”, Political Environmentalis, Terry Anderson, Editor, Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 2000

I can’t say that it looks like anything much has changed, given Harper’s stance on climate change, endangered species… hell, science and the future in general.

So, yes, I could see this coming when I was in college where the choice for work after graduation was government or corporate.  Neither path seems to have a lot of integrity attached to it, depending on where you end up.  Actually, you don’t even need to be a scientist to get the short end of the stick in today’s modern attacks on nature and it’s preservation.  Anyway, I chose a much more roundabout way to end up living next to one ocean and two seas over my lifetime.  I won’t deny that I miss the water, there is nothing like scuba diving on a reef or wandering the beach at low tide.  There is nothing more magical than a tide pool in my eyes to this day, except maybe the ponds I grew up getting my boots soaked in.

But I digress.  I look at the Congress with a not a little envy, but then I see the welcoming note from Victoria’s mayor and I remember that Victoria still spills its raw sewage straight out into the Pacific and I think that’s just the way it is: people meet, people talk, people demonstrate we must change or die, and then everybody goes away and Victoria keeps spilling raw sewage into the Pacific.  Evidence means little when you can dismiss the researchers as snobby elitists or hippies and you can claim cleaning up your act will cost too much money and maybe we’ll do it tomorrow.  Of course, you don’t actually believe in the science because you don’t understand it and who the hell cares about a bunch of fish anyway?  There’s always more fish, right?  Then again, when the salmon finally disappears we’ll all just unpackage our artificially grown meat and chow down.  After all, there will be 7 billion of us come October, and we can’t all eat real salmon, can we?  Nope, those will belong only to those that can afford it (and no, I don’t think Soylent Green may be far off the mark for the future, given the things humans have done in the past).

But enough.  The fact is we live on a beautiful and incredibly wonderful planet, in terms of life, that is, and though I’d rather not include humans in that “life” part sometimes, the fact is that there are a lot of people out there who know how to relate to a horse on horse level, who love their dogs, who will die for a gorilla or stand up for a nature refuge, or who will spend their entire lives studying a certain species of slug.  Or know how to please a shark.  So screw the politicians and the corporates, those “sharks” who are all about themselves and the next vote and the next dollar.  There are some things you really can’t buy or pray for.  You have to take a risk for a better world and care for something other than yourself and your fellow human consumers.  Otherwise you might just end up eating yourself.

 

Posted in Home Page/Journal | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Yeah, well, anyway, what’s new….

And people in the west wonder why I don’t like the Conservatives…. Well, all I have to do is look to the south, to the party lines and the politics Mr. Harper is trying to emulate (very subtly but successfully, I might add), and I give it about 5 years before these sorts of things start happening here in “mild-mannered” Canada.  Neither the arts or the environment made any dent as issues in our election.  For the most part Harper controlled the economic fear based agenda of the election from the get-go.  Unfortunately, our other “leaders” had their heads stuck way too far up their partisanships to take a good look at the big picture and either call Harper properly on his games or come up with a bigger idea than “oh no, the sky’s gonna fall if you vote in Harper” which, if you haven’t been paying attention to what Harper’s actually been doing, and most Canadians obviously haven’t, then that’s just a dare to vote for somebody the “intellectual alien” Iggy doesn’t like.  Really, Canada, the Conservatives have run roughshod over all sorts of democratic processes and would sell you to the highest bidder (or the lowest if they have the right connections) and you’re all for it.  Pretty bloody typical.  It’s too bad that the only somewhat sensible thing that came out of this is that we are finally beginning to see the future of North American politics infect Canada with the rise of the somewhat left NDP.  Let the real nastiness ensue…

Oh, wait, here it starts.  And to think, the Conservatives want Enbridge (yes, that Enbridge) to build a pipeline from the tar sands to Kitimat.  Aaahhh, I can see the Chinese money flowing into all those oil and gas coffers and bonuses, and all those royalties and “economic” votes falling into the Conservatives’ laps.  It’s a wonderful world, isn’t it?  And thirty years from now, when all those very successful right-minded people move on to retirement in villas in Barbados (will it be underwater by then? considering the sea level is rising more than expected maybe they’ll be living in Switzerland, instead) or are so far up the food chain they can’t be touched, like say, a Wall Street CEO, and Enbridge’s “new” technology is 30 years out of date and “too expensive” to update then maybe we’ll see another Peace River or Michigan “accident”.  Except it will be on a much larger scale and we, and the wildlife and the environment, will pay for it.  But by then we may have much larger problems and a “little” oil spill may be the least of our worries.  I know those who built it won’t be worrying about it.

Posted in Journal | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Devin Townsend: A Uniquely Canadian Musical Voice

The music world is a pretty screwed place in soooo many respects.  As a music fanatic for more years than I care to remember I am always intrigued and effected more by the actual music than the personalities behind it.  I suppose I am rare in that, although I am interested in who Shakespeare actually was, I personally believe truly profound art does not require either its appreciators or detractors to recognize its creator, never mind analyze him or her to the point of evisceration.  That being said I am always happy to come across thoughtful and interesting people who have somewhat original takes on life, or as original as is possible these days.

I first heard Devin Townsend when he did the vocals on Steve Vai’s “Sex & Religion” album way back when. 

Although the music didn’t exactly wow me (I’m not one to put technique over emotional resonance) I found the young singer to be unique and interesting.  And then I forgot about him and Vai.

Years later I hear a sample track of a band called Strapping Young Lad which, given the plethora of “crushed entrails for breakfast” named underground metal bands, is pretty interesting.  The music, however, is a wall of simplistic rage.  I can relate to this, but only modestly, and I have other places to spend my money.  I forget about them.

Devin’s name keeps coming up in the underground mags so I begin to pay attention.  It turns out he does some progressive stuff removed from SYL with Ocean Machine reaching somewhat legendary status.  Interesting.  I pick up Accelerated Evolution.  It’s good, not really mindblowing but obviously intelligent, emotional, and the production is awesome. 

I try SYL’s SYL and it is a huge slab of rage with a few interesting parts. 
Case in point:

Then I’m recommended Dev’s Terria and that’s a bit more of a mindblower. 

Now, though I’m not a fanatic by any means, I have to say that when he gets it right he really nails it and I pretty much will buy what ever he puts out just for that experience and the fact you never know where he’s going to go or what he’s going to do (within certain limits, of course).  Although he eschews the pop formula of catchy hooks he can do it when he wants but he’s more interested in… well, I’ll let him explain that.

What I find interesting about Dev is that there is no pretense about him and he comes across as very genuine and fairly humble, which is interesting considering how prolific and venerated he is among a certain class of music appreciators.  When you think of the excesses of some of the “great ones” who have put out less than half of what he’s done and of far less quality then it’s rather inspiring to find someone who seems so “grounded” while being so accomplished.  Strangely, he’s Canadian, a West Coaster at that.  Like most Canadian hard rock and metal musicians (ie, Rush, Triumph, Harem Scarem, etc.) he had to succeed outside of Canada first.  We seem to be stuck in the pseudo-folk country worshiping groove where everyone with a guitar thinks they’re either Joni Mitchell or Neil Young remakes or they want to be the next Drake.  And no, I refuse to count Nickelback as anything much except repetitious, Canada’s soppy answer to AC/DC.

I mean, really, could you ever see most Canadian bands daring to do this?

or this:

I mean Canadians have a pretty distinct sense of humor but when it comes to music most of them are pretty er… mopey.

So here’s to Dev, the crazy guy who has only ever said one thing that pissed me of and that was that he didn’t read. Yeah, well, Kanye West he ain’t (I hope) and, as I’m personally very strong proponent of literacy, I like to believe that he was being ironic or sarcastic with the interviewer.  It was a print interview so it’s hard to know.

As a proghead, I have to say I would love to see him open for Rush, two of the best progressive acts in the world from one of the least progressive music loving countries in the world.

In June he will release the final two albums of his Devin Townsend Project, Deconstructed and Ghost which should cap off what has been quite a good journey so far, nicely diverse:

1) from Ki

and 2) from Addicted

Consider this one of the few times I will actually extol a Canadian musician as being anything other than ordinary.  There’s a lot of talent in this country but we seem to prefer blandness, like reruns of Blue Rodeo thrown in a blender with Arcade Fire (both very good bands… well, the Rodeo has gotten rather tired this last decade) and then having all the tasty chewy bits sieved out.

Posted in Journal | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

In Guises of Power and Futility (The Horror of Caitlin Kiernan, part 2)

I fell off the wagon a while back (no, not the alcohol wagon, the work wagon) and am having a hell of a time getting back on.  Well, I guess it’s the fact that I’ve known 5 people that have died in the last 3 months and I’ve had to put down a dog and a horse that I both held very dearly.  The truth is it’s been harder on my parents than myself for the most part and it’s very hard to watch them watch their friends die off.  It’s one of those situations where you ask “well, what the hell’s the point?”  As I tend to ask myself this question all the time, and it’s rarely ever been answered on any topic, never mind life and work, this sort of debacle happens to me all the time.  I tend to blame my parents.  I was one of those kids who was always asking “Why?” and they were the type of people who always answered “Because I said so.”  Consequently, one always is running into blocks when searching for meaning in things because “I said so” is a horrible answer which makes you dig harder for the answers as you grow up (if you’re the curious type who resents stupid power plays) and some answers you might find and they will depress you and some answers you will never find and that might depress you, too.

Sigh….

But that is a topic for another post on politics.

Today, I want to respond to Caitlin Kiernan’s denial of her being a “horror” writer.  First, my credentials:  I have a degree in English and another in psych, and I took the education because I loved to learn and was interested in the subjects, not because I thought they would get me a job.  Consequently, I try to filter and analyze almost everything I come across.  It makes me kind of crazy compared to those who don’t like to think, I suppose, but I also enjoy reflection so that makes up for it.  Second: I first started reading her with either Low Red Moon or Silk or maybe it was Threshold, I forget which, but I think it was Silk.  At that time my experience with horror was still Steven King, who I enjoy somewhat though I find his characters rather repetitive.  Throw in some Clark Aston Smith, Lovecraft, classic “horror” like Frankenstein and Dracula, and a heavy dose of X Files and a few other shows and movies and you have my horror background.  I’m not really a gore horror lover.  When you’ve had to cut a dead calcified calf out of it’s living mother with piano wire or pluck a rotten infected eye out of a living cow or shoot your favourite dog or walk long trips in the dark through bear infested woods the modern blood’n'guts stuff looks rather mild and simply gratuitous.  However, if you have a really vivid imagination and a tendency to empathize with people, animals, and situations (which is why, in my books, the stupid petty people in Blair Witch Project simply could not die quick enough) horror movies are some of the last things you want to watch.  Seen my share of pain, caused some of it, have no real desire to see people or animals I like die horribly.  Not my idea of a lovely Sunday afternoon’s entertainment.  And no, I can’t understand people’s fascination with torture porn films like the Saw films.  Well, I suppose I can but I’ve read enough history that makes those sorts of depictions of violence and fear look like school boy pranks, which leave me with more questions about humanity’s need to watch other people suffer than anything else.  But I’m off topic.

So yes, I started reading Kiernan in her early days.  The first thing that struck me was her amazing ability with words.  Actually, ability isn’t the best term, “talent” is better because, well, she simply has natural talent when it comes to turning a poetic though effective phrase and she wasn’t afraid to take risks.  And when it came to being convoluted and dark beyond dark she was there in a murky “what the hell have I gotten myself into and what the hell does it mean?” kind of way.  I think I actually read about four or maybe five of her books, which for me is quite a feat because I rarely read that many books of any author unless it’s a series I really enjoy.  Heck, I still haven’t read Gaiman’s Anansi Boys and I’ve had it for years.  In these days of the “everyone’s a writer and here’s the 6 day course that will make you famous” it’s not easy finding authors that are that interesting, that really have serious underlying personal and philosophical conflicts that saturate their prose in a good way.  However, there is always a problem with being so heavy and not being able to resolve the central conflict at the heart of most of your works because, of course, stories are always about their authors, by which I mean the author’s personal issues, their points of view, their vocabulary, their thinking structure and habits, etc.   Give two different people the same poem to revise and I’ll bet you you’ll have two different revisions (thus different poems) which would bring about two different interpretations by the same person.

In my opinion, horror, true horror, is about the confrontation with the great devouring unknown which can be within or without, physical or metaphysical (preferably both), and manifests itself in numerous ways but always in terms of overwhelming power differences.  Stephen King’s Carrie, one of the great classics of horror, is really about bullying, both via peers and parents.  It’s a social commentary more than anything else born out of King’s own experience as a teacher.  He just added a little psychic ability to up the anti.  But which violation was worse, the dumping of pig’s blood on Carrie and Tommy Ross and the resulting laughter, or her loss of control and revenge?  Carrie was being emotionally devoured by conformity and apathy, those monsters that live in all of us waiting only for their function of fitting in with the crowd so we can blend in and not be isolated, which is death for such social animals as we are.  Power, right or wrong, resides in the crowd and so often then does survival.  Carrie is a reaction to that group mind: it asks the question “yeah, so what if the victim of the crowd isn’t anywhere as weak as you want her to be?”  Such dreams of the emotionally isolated perhaps would have saved many people over the years, such as the thousands of people tortured and executed for being witches, and acceptance of those who are different may have averted events such as the Columbine High School Massacre, which, if you think about it, has very similar properties to Carrie.

Bullying is even more commonplace now – because it’s easier, more available, not to mention it can follow you wherever you go-  than when I was growing up, which means I suspect it’s grown more vicious because it can breed with itself much more readily, building up mutual reinforcements and psychological impurities in societies that are not based so much on social and community bonds but marketplace values.  In a competitive marketplace you are only worth what you can buy or what you can sell, be it image, sex, or power (even, occasionally, skills) and you demonstrate these things via comparison to others, or what you can do to them.  The natural competitive instinct to ruin other people for your own gain is usually tempered in a somewhat balanced community because there will be a negative reaction from the community if your actions are considered unjust because your actions threaten not only the victim but the community as a whole.  Social norms, once violated, are often very difficult to reinstate or recover.  You have earned a reputation through your actions and cohesive communities have long memories.  In much of today’s society – divergently disconnected in moral terms while even more connected via shallow “social” mediums (read any youtube video commentary) – I would argue everything is for sale, including you and your reputation, because you will not be judged so much by your actions but by your social prestige via Twitter, Facebook, etc. and maybe your social connections.  In fact, your actions may bring about two very different social reactions depending on who your enemies are.  For example, Mr. Bieber is now where he is, whereas 15 year old Jenna Bowers-Bryanton hung herself thanks to being bullied, partially because of the reactions to her youtube songs by her enemies.  Personally, I think with a little work she could have been quite good.  Now we’ll never know.  But she is not an exception.

Horror is always set in a vast power discrepancy between the devoured and the devourer: the spider toying with the trapped fly, the Taliban and the hostage about to be beheaded, governments and truth (I mean, really, how much more horrifying an end could you ask for than the House of Representatives’ questioning of the generals and Rumsfeld at the end of The Tillman Story?).  It is that sense of helplessness when you face the unstoppable Jason, the completely alien Alien, the beautiful great white in Jaws, the unknowable gods of Lovecraft, the “logic” of Ann Coulter or Glenn Beck, etc.

Kiernan writes all sorts of stuff, from science fiction to suspense to (deviant) romance to horror to fantasy, but underneath it all there is a deep awareness of the unfairness of things, of the sense of time and circumstance and choices made without your consent or even knowledge.  This perspective seems to arise from what seems to have been a rather errr… interesting childhood and deep connection to the history of the natural world (her being a paleontologist and all).  Most people avoid looking at time and what it says about our insignificant lives.  For awhile, it was her living.  For most people, I suspect, just the philosophical introspection it would require to get your head around 300 million or so years of planetary history would be terrifying (I’m thinking here specifically of those who think our earth was created about 6 thousand years ago).  It is an abyss and like all real abysses it infects your soul and changes you, whether you like it or not.  In Kiernan’s case, it is evident in her writing, circulating like fish in a tub of lilies, always winking at you from underneath the prettiness.  I don’t think she can deny this, this dark mortality and twisting many of our conventional norms which mean nothing (other than absurdly naive and foolish human trivialities in the face of true reality) to the construction of art in the service of expanding our borders of knowledge, most of which makes conventional and fearful people want to wallow back to their peaceful little Fox News where all the answers are so pat and the world is a simple them versus us.

Sometimes I really envy that sort of world view, the happy “they’re all evil because they aren’t us… yet” belief.  It would make losing people easier I think, because it wouldn’t raise any questions about meaning, both personal and universal.  For some, not having those answers are really the horror: for me, and I think for Kiernan and many other searchers, it is just one big unsolvable mystery and there is a great deal of joy and sorrow to be derived from exploring that mystery.  And, perhaps, if we’re attentive and lucky, we might even gain some wisdom (if such a thing can be said to exist).

Until then, I leave you with something that Kiernan put up on her blog (and I subsequently stole, as per usual).  For some of you it will be a test of horror, for others it is an exploration of the meaning of love.  As with all good art, it will tell you something about yourself, whether you like it or not.

 

“How to Make Love to a Trans Person”

Forget the images you’ve learned to attach
To words like cock and clit,
Chest and breasts.
Break those words open
Like a paramedic cracking ribs
To pump blood through a failing heart.
Push your hands inside.
Get them messy.
Scratch new definitions on the bones.

Get rid of the old words altogether.
Make up new words.
Call it a click or a ditto.
Call it the sound he makes
When you brush your hand against it through his jeans,
When you can hear his heart knocking on the back of his teeth
And every cell in his body is breathing.
Make the arch of her back a language
Name the hollows of each of her vertebrae
When they catch pools of sweat
Like rainwater in a row of paper cups
Align your teeth with this alphabet of her spine
So every word is weighted with the salt of her.

When you peel layers of clothing from his skin
Do not act as though you are changing dressings on a trauma patient
Even though it’s highly likely that you are.
Do not ask if she’s “had the surgery.”
Do not tell him that the needlepoint bruises on his thighs look like they hurt
If you are being offered a body
That has already been laid upon an altar of surgical steel
A sacrifice to whatever gods govern bodies
That come with some assembly required
Whatever you do,
Do not say that the carefully sculpted landscape
Bordered by rocky ridges of scar tissue
Looks almost natural.

If she offers you breastbone
Aching to carve soft fruit from its branches
Though there may be more tissue in the lining of her bra
Than the flesh that rises to meet it,
Let her ripen in your hands.
Imagine if she’d lost those swells to cancer,
Diabetes,
A car accident instead of an accident of genetics
Would you think of her as less a woman then?
Then think of her as no less one now.

If he offers you a thumb-sized sprout of muscle
Reaching toward you when you kiss him
Like it wants to go deep enough inside you
To scratch his name on the bottom of your heart
Hold it as if it can-
In your hand, in your mouth
Inside the nest of your pelvic bones.
Though his skin may hardly do more than brush yours,
You will feel him deeper than you think.

 

 

Realize that bodies are only a fraction of who we are
They’re just oddly-shaped vessels for hearts
And honestly, they can barely contain us
We strain at their seams with every breath we take
We are all pulse and sweat,
Tissue and nerve ending
We are programmed to grope and fumble until we get it right.
Bodies have been learning each other forever.
It’s what bodies do.
They are grab bags of parts
And half the fun is figuring out
All the different ways we can fit them together;
All the different uses for hipbones and hands,
Tongues and teeth;
All the ways to car-crash our bodies beautiful.
But we could never forget how to use our hearts
Even if we tried.
That’s the important part.
Don’t worry about the bodies.
They’ve got this.

– Gabe Moses

Posted in Journal | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Return to Form: Two Old Poems and a failed Experiment

It’s been a long and rather difficult year both personally and internationally.  I am really, really looking forward to spring this year, to no snow and long walks in new grass and enjoying a beautiful breeze and the sun on my face.  Then more outdoor work and getting my hands dirty in the dirt and grease and trying to produce those little green things that people eat.  It will be a nice contrast to a bad taste in my mouth 2011 is leaving.  I think I will have gone to more memorials in this past three months then I’ve had to attend in the past two years.  And then there’s Elizabeth Taylor.  Never was much of a fan but one can’t deny the power of Who’s Afraid of Virgina Woolf? and gaze distantly at her life with a mix of wonder and pathos.  It’s proving to be one heck of a year of change, the holding patterns are falling away, and consequently one must change or die.  Sometimes it’s both.

And today comes the news that there will be another gas well on our place asap.  Hooray and shoot me now.  Please.  Been spending time, money, and effort to get organic certification and if I’m not getting sidetracked by family then it’s some jackass rig push trying to get on the land like yesterday was too late.  Soon, the ranch will look like this.

Yippee, all that money!!! I can hear certain people say.

Too bad we landowners see so little of it but get left all the crap, never mind the damage to the wildlife and the environment.

Wait, do I sound bitter?  Why, yes, I do, and I guess that’s because I’m becoming more bitter every day with regards to these people.  And the federal election isn’t helping.  But that’s a subject for another day.

Other projects are marching on.  I have missed a deadline for the 31st, which, considering I lost the first 10 or so pages I wrote for the project, I’ve had to make up.  But it’s looking alright but it’s probably won’t go where it’s supposed to unless Henry down at the Rabbit Hole is going to give me an extension. But business is business so probably not.  Then there’s “The Island of Horses” which just keeps going and is producing more work than I thought it ever would.  But that’s what I get for be an “intuitive” writer rather than an outline or formula writer.  I never know what roads my characters are going to wander down.  Hell, I can barely predict my own path these days.

So, in the vein of things past and to come I’ve thrown up a couple of old poems from my more dramatic days and I would have included my latest Garageband dabbling Experiment #5: Journey in ADHD, all 18 minutes of it, which is a kind of sonic story, I suppose, cobbled together from other people’s works, but it’s too big to upload.  I’ll have to modify a few things and I’ll get it up later.

May your process always be interesting, just not too interesting.

Cheers.

 

Bone (1990)

“I’m dreaming.”
“Yes. Yes, you are.”
“It’s beautiful.”
“Yes.  I suppose one might think that.”
“Why am I dreaming?”
“An eternal question indeed.”
“No, but I mean really, why?”
“Why not?”

 

“Am I really dreaming?”
“You tell me.”
“You said I was.”
“I could be lying.”
“Why would you lie?”
“Why not?”

 

“I don’t understand.”
“Who does?”
“Well, someone has got to.”
“Really?”
“Yes, if no one understands then what’s the point?”
“Good question.”

 

“I give up.”
“Give up what?”
“Trying to make sense of anything.  And you’re not helping.”
“Am I supposed to?”
“I thought so.”
“Oh.  That’s strange.”
“What?”
“I thought you were supposed to be helping me.”

 

“Why are you here?”
“Where should I be?”
“Anywhere you want to be.”
“And what if I want to be here?”
“Why would you want that?”
“Why not?”
“No, really, tell me.”
“I am here for you, as you are here for me.”
“You’re very frustrating, but I’m still glad you’re here.”
“I am glad, too.”
“Will you always be here?”
“As long as you wish.”
“Then I wish forever.  It’s lonely here and I need a friend.”
“Who says I am a friend?”
“I do.”
“To forever then.”

 

 

Love Lies in Ruins (1991)

Come, o Withered One, up the step we go
Past the dark columns of ivory and of jade
Through the gloom and light of evening’s day.
These old weights of marble and ebony, these
Faces once so bold, they have lost their
Glimmer now and are but ash and gold
+++++++ (Built from millions of cigarettes,
+++++++ tossed out of windows of casual desire);
Burnt offerings at the alter of Despair.

Where are Hitler, and Helen, and Will S.?
Their crypts are here; their moldering bones
shall lie forthwith
Beside yours,
Beside mine.
And Love, Dear Love, shall not be able
To see the difference between our masks:
The skin so strong, the eyes so full of wonder.
Such a smile to linger in memory:
Such a kiss before the final coitus.

But she said:

“(–The weeds among the stones are strong,
Brave and reckless in their loving intent,
Wretched beneath all the living ones
Who saunter through these dusty halls.
These weeds, they cry and raise their children
To high above their own poor lives, to
Bring down this edifice of pain, to
Make stone into fertile soil: into Earth–)”

And I see you now, your gaze is black
With fear, your hunger raw upon the wind.
What tears you had have fallen, dropped
To moisten others’ fortunes, if only for a
little while.  Such seeds of divine destruction
Cannot catch up to the future you would procure.
It is done, all done, fallen to the ground,
Like semen, like desire, like faith.  There,
Small things crawl from our cathedral’s crevices–
Our Doors open to all–to stopper up their bottles of time
With our blood, to build their castles with our bone.

Do you see?  Do you see the sun on the razor
Horizon, like a golden fly impaled by God’s wings,
Struggling to cast itself off into light or night,
Its wings humming in desperation, its legs
Scrabbling madly with the clouds, futility alight, the
Refusal to die, the time to live long past.
But glory shall never die as long as the sun
Shall be; and you and I–yes, you and I–
Shall sit upon these broken steps, and haunt these
Ancient halls, like the heroes and villains of
Old.  for we are lost here, cast out as street
Trash, stinking from our own filth: that which we
Would keep for ourselves and never give away, for
Fear of polluting this world, this black
Calculator of Death,
+++++++ With our dark Love.

Posted in Journal, Poetry | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

But, really, Huck, what does it all mean?

So, it’s way past my bed time and I’ve got a lot of work to do tomorrow but sometimes there are things in life that cannot be passed up, if for no other reason than I like them and agree with them.  Case in point:

Truly, the world is a wonderful and wacky place sometimes.  It helps to alleviate the really terrifying craziness.  And remember, folks, support your local robots, or at least watch Futurama once and awhile.  Bender Rules!

Posted in Journal | Tagged , , | Leave a comment